Automated research refresh updated the product evidence set.
Before: Evidence 61 · Safety 66 · Effectiveness 52 · Confidence 74
After: Evidence 56 · Safety 66 · Effectiveness 51 · Confidence 72
Globe Clotrimazole Antifungal Cream 1% USP (1 oz), Anti Fungal Treatment, Relieves Itching, Burning, Cracking and Scaling Associated Athletes Foot, Jock Itch, Ringworm and More
EFFECTIVE TREATMENT: Combat athletes foot, jock itch, and ringworm with our clotrimazole antifungal cream. This proven formula effectively treats common fungal infections, making it a trusted solution for relief and recovery.
Direct product evidence5 papers indexed · 3 claims mapped
Resar evidence panel
0–100 · cited research only
Evidence Score
56
Emerging
Safety Score
66
Good
Effectiveness Score
51
Emerging
Research Confidence
72
Strong
Product Fit Score
41
Limited
Bottom line
Limited evidence (Emerging) — treat claims cautiously and review sources directly.
Product fit is weaker — dose, price, or practical use may not align with what studies tested.
Evidence Score
56
Emerging
Price
$4.85
Resar may earn an affiliate commission on this purchase. Commissions never change scores — see our affiliate disclosure and conflicts policy. Scores reflect cited research, not medical advice.
Compare others in SkincareTop research
The strongest studies behind this product
Ranked by evidence hierarchy and how closely each study matches this product. Start with the strongest study, then read down. Every claim needs a trail.
Strongest studySupporting evidence90% relevance
Comparison of clotrimazole cream, Whitfield's ointment and Nystatin ointment for the topical treatment of ringworm infections, pityriasis versicolor, erythrasma and candidiasis
Other · British Journal of Dermatology · 1973
What the research shows
The likely user benefit should be interpreted cautiously until the full paper is reviewed for the product's most realistic positive benefit for the shopper.
Direct product evidenceRead study
2345
Human RCT84% relevance
A randomized double-blinded control trial of Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine Intermittent Preventive Treatment (SP-IPT) and Chloroquine Chemoprophylaxis in the prevention of malaria in pregnancy.
Randomized Controlled Trial · AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · 2015
Direct product evidence
Supporting evidence78% relevance
Clinical evaluation of antifungal agent nitric acid omokonazole (HOC-155) cream used for treatment of foot ringworm. Examination of application frequency.
Other · Nishi Nihon Hifuka · 1996
Category-level evidence
Indirect evidence72% relevance
Methylene blue, a common antioxidant, could reverse signs of aging in human skin
Other ·
Category-level evidence
Indirect evidence66% relevance
IMT-380: A first in class anti-CD161 antibody targeting pathogenic T cells in autoimmune diseases
Other · Video Digital Object Group · 2025
Category-level evidence
Scores reflect these cited studies, not medical advice. Expand the full evidence detail below for protocols, dose context, and reported side effects.
Did this clinical breakdown make sense?
Share this evidence report
Send a link to this page so others can read the same breakdown.
Claim ledger
Every claim, mapped to its source
Each product claim below is tied to a specific paper with study type, match strength, and limitations. Nothing here is medical advice — it is a research trail you can audit.
Claim match reflects how closely a specific paper supports this benefit — not AI confidence or medical certainty.
ClaimEvidence directnessMatchStudy type
Full evidence detail
Study-by-study breakdown
Each paper below is ranked for this listing. Start with the highest match, then expand any study for a plain-language readout.
How to read this section
- Match % - how closely the study matches this product (not overall scientific quality).
- Evidence type - study design (RCT, review, etc.) and whether it is direct, category-level, or indirect.
- What it found - short summary and quoted extract from the paper metadata. Not medical advice.
Direct product evidenceThis study closely matches this product or its active ingredient.
In plain language
This paper appears relevant to the product's most realistic positive benefit for the shopper based on its title, source, and study type. [1]
What the study reported
Verified extract — not AI generated
“The likely user benefit should be interpreted cautiously until the full paper is reviewed for the product's most realistic positive benefit for the shopper.”
How it was used
Use context could not be reliably extracted from metadata alone and should be verified during curation.
Side effects noted
Safety details should be checked against the full paper and the product's actual use instructions.
Caveats
This fallback uses metadata ranking and should be upgraded with full AI or manual review before stronger claims.
Transparency
Score history
Human review is pending for this listing.
Reviews
Shopper feedback
4.6
average rating
16,351 Amazon reviews were available from the listing metadata.