Core Power Protein Shake, Chocolate, 26g Bottle, 14oz, 12 Pack

tsentiment: Fetching Tweet Data for Sentiment Analysis

Other · CRAN: Contributed Packages · 2021

CornerstoneR: Collection of Scripts for Interface Between 'Cornerstone' and 'R'

Other · CRAN: Contributed Packages · 2018

in the movie on construction—of image, identity, of power—which is deeply unsettling… LT: It’s very disturbing to recognize how constructed things are and to find yourself in a set-up you never made. In Committed, Frances Farmer is shown as trapped in different narratives or languages— family, love, law, psychiatry, femininity. That’s why I was attracted to her life. She was a tragic, famous figure, her plight was dramatic but not really unusual. How do you get to all that, as a writer or film-maker, and make it extreme, let’s say, visible and visceral, which we wanted to do? One way is to upset the delivery system, the codes. PN: In the same interview you observe that ‘A very important effect of feminism on psychoanalysis has been in talking about the institution as being descriptive rather than prescriptive.’ You go on to say that the discovery that ‘through speaking you can undo things, has made a big difference’. That seems to tie together your various interests in psychoanalysis, film and language, and to set up the narrative and stylistic techniques we’ve talked about as a means of ‘undoing’ things. Could you comment on that ten years on, in the light of what you have written since that interview? LT: I’m less certain now about what can be undone, though I still believe in talking and writing, making things or unmaking them if possible. Seeing ideas as descriptive not as prescriptive is still important to me. That’s why I’m against censorship and interested in offensive jokes. I’m using them in the novel I’m working on now, No Lease on Life. I’m questioning notions of outer and inner, public/ private, how each of us—how I—exist in a framework in which we are affected, bombarded, by the world, and still manage to think, feel, have our own worlds. Writing becomes more important to me even if it sometimes feels more futile. (laughs) More feudal. University of Sussex

Other · Textual Practice · 2005

warrants would be to consider in your minds how far this offence exceeds the rest in seriousness. You will find that all other crimes harm a part of one’s life, while outrage ruins the whole of one’s affairs, that many households have been destroyed by it and many states devastated. [10] Why waste time speaking of the misfortunes of others? We ourselves have seen the democracy overthrown twice and been robbed of our freedom twice, not by people guilty of other kinds of criminality but by people who despised the laws and were willing to be the enemy’s slaves and subject the citizens to wilful violence. [11] And the defendant is one of them. Even if he is too young to be part of the constitution in place then, still his character belongs to that regime. It was natures such as his which handed our power to the enemy, knocked down the walls protecting our land, and killed fifteen hundred citizens without trial. [12] It is appropriate for you to remember those events and take vengeance not only on the ones who abused us at that time but also on those who now desire to reduce the city to that condition, and on those whom you expect to turn out evil more than on those who offended before, in so far as it is better to find a means of preventing future crimes than to punish those which have already taken place. [13] Do not wait for them to band together and seize an opportunity to offend against the whole city, but use any pretext on which they are handed over to you to take vengeance on them. Consider it a stroke of luck whenever you catch a man who has demonstrated the whole of his criminality in petty acts. [14] It would have been best of all if the wicked among mankind bore some mark to enable you to chastise them, before any of the citizen body is wronged. But since it is impossible to discover them before someone is harmed by them, at least when they are recognized everyone should hate such men and consider them public enemies. [15] Bear in mind that risks to property do not apply to the poor, but we all alike are subject to assault on our persons. So when you punish people who take money, you benefit only the rich, but when you chastise those who commit outrage, you are helping yourselves. [16] So you must take trials such as this especially seriously, and in the case of transactions in general you should assess the penalty at the amount you think the prosecutor should get, but in the case of outrage you should assess a penalty whose payment will make the defendant desist from his current excesses. [17] If then you deprive of their property people who subject citizens to wilful abuse and if you hold the view that no penalty is sufficiently severe for people whose crimes are

Other · Trials from Classical Athens · 2002